Cyntech Group — Geotech Parser

Option	Hardware and cost model
1 · Cloud evaluation AWS / Azure cloud infrastructure · no hardware purchase	Managed cloud infrastructure on AWS / Azure - compute, storage, networking. No hardware purchase. Cyntech pays cloud compute and AI inference costs directly. HPD math runs server-side with predictable overhead.
2 · Oction-hosted Cloud evaluation → Mac Studio M4 Ultra	Phase 1: Oction-managed cloud environment (AWS/Azure) - no hardware purchase required. Phase 2+: one Mac Studio M4 Ultra, 512GB, 16TB ≈ $23,000 USD - hosted in the Oction secure facility. Hardware purchased by Cyntech. Oction manages power, cooling, maintenance, and all software. Fixed monthly fee. No token metering. No surprise bills.
3 · Cyntech-hosted Cloud evaluation → Mac Studio Ultra	Phase 1: Oction-managed cloud environment - no hardware purchase. Phase 2+: one Mac Studio M4 Ultra, 512GB, 16TB ≈ $23,000 USD Hardware purchased by Cyntech; software managed by Oction.

Option

Hardware and cost model

1 · Cloud evaluation

AWS / Azure cloud infrastructure · no hardware purchase

Managed cloud infrastructure on AWS / Azure - compute, storage, networking. No hardware purchase. Cyntech pays cloud compute and AI inference costs directly. HPD math runs server-side with predictable overhead.

2 · Oction-hosted

Cloud evaluation → Mac Studio M4 Ultra

Phase 1: Oction-managed cloud environment (AWS/Azure) - no hardware purchase required.
Phase 2+: one Mac Studio M4 Ultra, 512GB, 16TB ≈ $23,000 USD - hosted in the Oction secure facility.
Hardware purchased by Cyntech. Oction manages power, cooling, maintenance, and all software. Fixed monthly fee. No token metering. No surprise bills.

3 · Cyntech-hosted

Cloud evaluation → Mac Studio Ultra

Phase 1: Oction-managed cloud environment - no hardware purchase.
Phase 2+: one Mac Studio M4 Ultra, 512GB, 16TB ≈ $23,000 USD
Hardware purchased by Cyntech; software managed by Oction.

Component	Milestone	Investment
Phase 1 · Data Ingestion Start here	Week 0	$18,000
Phase 1 · Portal delivery	Week 9	$22,000
Phase 1 · Benchmark and go-live	Week 17	$28,000
Phase 1 total	$68,000
Phase 2 · Build	8–10 weeks	$45,000
Phase 3 · Build	6–8 weeks	$35,000
Total build fee	$148,000
Monthly retainer - Option 1 (Cloud)	After go-live	$10,000 / mo
Monthly retainer - Option 2 (Oction-hosted)	After go-live	$12,500 / mo
Monthly retainer - Option 3 (Cyntech-hosted)	After go-live	$10,000 / mo

Component

Milestone

Investment

Phase 1 · Data Ingestion Start here

Week 0

$18,000

Phase 1 · Portal delivery

Week 9

$22,000

Phase 1 · Benchmark and go-live

Week 17

$28,000

Phase 1 total

$68,000

Phase 2 · Build

8–10 weeks

$45,000

Phase 3 · Build

6–8 weeks

$35,000

Total build fee

$148,000

Monthly retainer - Option 1 (Cloud)

After go-live

$10,000 / mo

Monthly retainer - Option 2 (Oction-hosted)

After go-live

$12,500 / mo

Monthly retainer - Option 3 (Cyntech-hosted)

After go-live

$10,000 / mo

Scenario	Year one	Year two
Option 1 · Cloud	$158,000 Build $68k + 9 mo retainer ($90k)	$165,000 Retainer $120k + Phase 2 $45k
Option 2 · Oction-hosted	$180,500 Build $68k + 9 mo retainer ($112.5k)	$195,000 Retainer $150k + Phase 2 $45k
Option 3 · Cyntech-hosted	~$190,700 Build $68k + retainer $90k + hardware ~$32.7k	$165,000 Retainer $120k + Phase 2 $45k

Scenario

Year one

Year two

Option 1 · Cloud

$158,000

Build $68k + 9 mo retainer ($90k)

$165,000

Retainer $120k + Phase 2 $45k

Option 2 · Oction-hosted

$180,500

Build $68k + 9 mo retainer ($112.5k)

$195,000

Retainer $150k + Phase 2 $45k

Option 3 · Cyntech-hosted

~$190,700

Build $68k + retainer $90k + hardware ~$32.7k

$165,000

Retainer $120k + Phase 2 $45k

Layer	Technology	Purpose
PDF parser	Docling (MIT open-source)	Geotech reports, structural drawings, design criteria extraction - 90%+ OCR confidence gate
Calculation engine	Python 3.11 + numpy + pandas	HPD twin (372 rows) + MCE twin (5,474 SKUs) - deterministic, minimal token overhead per design
PDF output	Puppeteer + headless Chrome	Print-ready proposal generation in Cyntech format
Knowledge graph	Neo4j (dedicated instance)	Project history, pricing trends, similar-project lookup, full artifact provenance
Vector DB	Qdrant (dedicated instance)	Similar project retrieval, RAG for material specs
ERP sync	Acumatica REST API	5,474 SKU cost lookup, weekly price refresh
CRM	Zoho REST API	Client and PM contact sync
Workflow	Monday.com GraphQL API	Steps 1–13 pipeline orchestration (IT-26016)
Frontend	Next.js + shadcn/ui	PM dashboard, proposal viewer, HPD config - self-hosted
Auth	OAuth 2.0 + Tailscale VPN	Secure access control, Cyntech-only access

Layer

Technology

Purpose

PDF parser

Docling (MIT open-source)

Geotech reports, structural drawings, design criteria extraction - 90%+ OCR confidence gate

Calculation engine

Python 3.11 + numpy + pandas

HPD twin (372 rows) + MCE twin (5,474 SKUs) - deterministic, minimal token overhead per design

PDF output

Puppeteer + headless Chrome

Print-ready proposal generation in Cyntech format

Knowledge graph

Neo4j (dedicated instance)

Project history, pricing trends, similar-project lookup, full artifact provenance

Vector DB

Qdrant (dedicated instance)

Similar project retrieval, RAG for material specs

ERP sync

Acumatica REST API

5,474 SKU cost lookup, weekly price refresh

CRM

Zoho REST API

Client and PM contact sync

Workflow

Monday.com GraphQL API

Steps 1–13 pipeline orchestration (IT-26016)

Frontend

Next.js + shadcn/ui

PM dashboard, proposal viewer, HPD config - self-hosted

Auth

OAuth 2.0 + Tailscale VPN

Secure access control, Cyntech-only access

	Depth Below Grade	Stratum Thickness	General Classification	Undrained Shear Strength	Friction Angle	Bulk Unit Weight
Stratum A	0.0 ft	30.0 ft	30.0 ft	Cohesive	1,500 psf		100 pcf

Depth Below Grade

Stratum Thickness

General Classification

Undrained Shear Strength

Friction Angle

Bulk Unit Weight

Upper Limit

Lower Limit

Stratum A

0.0 ft

30.0 ft

Cohesive

1,500 psf

100 pcf

Item	Pile Type	Item Description	Unit Price	QTY	Subtotal
1	HP-1	FG. LEAD - ROUND, 03.500 IN OD x 0.254 IN WT x 07 FT LG, 10 IN, 12 IN, 14 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED	$200.00	3	$600.00
2	HP-1	FG. EXTENSION - ROUND, 03.500 IN OD x 0.254 IN WT x 10 FT LG, GALVANIZED	$307.00	3	$921.00
3	HP-1	FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 04.500 IN OD x 0.438 IN WT x 07 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 6 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED	$121.00	3	$363.00
4	HP-2 & 3	FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 2 x 20 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED	$605.80	17	$10,298.60
5	HP-2 & 3	FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED	$179.00	17	$3,043.00
6	HP-2 & 3 (Battered)	FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 2 x 20 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED	$605.80	3	$1,817.40
7	HP-2 & 3 (Battered)	FG. EXTENSION - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 10 FT LG, GALVANIZED	$253.50	3	$760.50
8	HP-2 & 3 (Battered)	FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED	$179.00	3	$537.00
9	HP-4	FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 3 x 24 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED	$946.40	1	$946.40
10	HP-4	FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED	$179.00	1	$179.00
11	HP-4 (Battered)	FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 3 x 24 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED	$946.40	3	$2,839.20
12	HP-4 (Battered)	FG. EXTENSION - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 10 FT LG, GALVANIZED	$253.50	3	$760.50
13	HP-4 (Battered)	FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED	$179.00	3	$537.00
14	-	ENGINEER REVIEW AND STAMP (IF REQUIRED)	$3,500.00	-	-
15	-	FREIGHT TO JOBSITE	$1,560.00	1	$1,560.00
Total	$25,162.60

Item

Pile Type

Item Description

Unit Price

QTY

Subtotal

HP-1

FG. LEAD - ROUND, 03.500 IN OD x 0.254 IN WT x 07 FT LG, 10 IN, 12 IN, 14 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED

$200.00

$600.00

HP-1

FG. EXTENSION - ROUND, 03.500 IN OD x 0.254 IN WT x 10 FT LG, GALVANIZED

$307.00

$921.00

HP-1

FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 04.500 IN OD x 0.438 IN WT x 07 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 6 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED

$121.00

$363.00

HP-2 & 3

FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 2 x 20 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED

$605.80

$10,298.60

HP-2 & 3

FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED

$179.00

$3,043.00

HP-2 & 3 (Battered)

FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 2 x 20 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED

$605.80

$1,817.40

HP-2 & 3 (Battered)

FG. EXTENSION - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 10 FT LG, GALVANIZED

$253.50

$760.50

HP-2 & 3 (Battered)

FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED

$179.00

$537.00

HP-4

FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 3 x 24 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED

$946.40

HP-4

FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED

$179.00

HP-4 (Battered)

FG. LEAD - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 20 FT LG, 3 x 24 IN DIA x 0.625 IN THK HELIX, GALVANIZED

$946.40

$2,839.20

HP-4 (Battered)

FG. EXTENSION - ROUND, 05.500 IN OD x 0.361 IN WT x 10 FT LG, GALVANIZED

$253.50

$760.50

HP-4 (Battered)

FG. PILE CAP - ROUND SLEEVE, 06.625 IN OD x 0.432 IN WT x 09 IN LG, ROUND PLATE, 8 IN DIA x 0.500 IN THK, GALVANIZED

$179.00

$537.00

ENGINEER REVIEW AND STAMP (IF REQUIRED)

$3,500.00

FREIGHT TO JOBSITE

$1,560.00

Total

$25,162.60

PRU26300

Project ID

60 kips

Compression load

94%

Soil-match confidence

4 hrs

Saved per pile

Upload Geotechnical Report

Step 1 - Extract soil parameters automatically

Required

↥

Drop geotechnical PDF here

or click to browse · Supports text-based and scanned PDFs · 25-80 pages typical

Structural Drawings

Step 2 - Pile quantity and spacing extraction

Optional

↥

Drop structural drawings here

Blueprints, foundation plans, permit sets · Phase 3: full CV parsing

Extracted Soil Parameters

From geotechnical report · Review gate: engineer verifies before accepting

Verified

Stratum (A/B/C/D)	Upper Limit (ft)	Lower Limit (ft)	Thickness (ft)	Classification	Su (psf)	φ (°)	γ (pcf)
A	0	4	4	CH - Fat clay	2,400	0	120
B	4	12	8	CL - Lean clay	3,600	22	122
C	12	20	8	SP - Poorly graded sand	-	34	118
D	20	35	15	GW - Well graded gravel	-	38	125

Design Loads

Enter required loads before running analysis

Factor of Safety 2.0 (hardcoded)

Compression Load (kips) *

Lateral Load (kips)

Moment (kip-ft)

Connection Type

Design Code

ASCE 7-16 (US) NBCC 2015 (Canada)

Soil Profile Reduction Review

AI recommendation - engineer approval required before design run

Pending Approval

Engineer approval required. Review the AI-proposed soil profile reduction below. The HPD Calculation Engine cannot run without your explicit Accept, Edit, or Flag decision.

Raw borehole data - 7 layers identified

A: 0-4ft, CH Fat Clay, Su=800 psf
B: 4-7ft, CL Lean Clay, Su=1100 psf
C: 7-10ft, CL Lean Clay, Su=1250 psf
D: 10-14ft, SM Silty Sand, φ=29°
E: 14-18ft, SW Sand, φ=33°
F: 18-22ft, GW Gravel, φ=37°
G: 22-30ft, GW Dense Gravel, φ=40°

AI recommendation - 4 design layers

23 similar Calgary-area projects in KAG

A: 0-4ft - Cohesive (soft)

Su=800 psf. Thin soft crust, surface weathering. CH confirmed.

B: 4-10ft - Cohesive (stiff) [merged B+C]

Su=1,100-1,250 psf merged. Similar Su range, consistent with PRU24038 Maple Ridge profile.

C: 10-18ft - Cohesionless [merged D+E]

φ=29-33° averaged. Transition to sand bearing zone. Helix seats here.

D: 18-30ft - Dense bearing [merged F+G]

φ=37-40°, N>40 SPT. Primary capacity zone. Matches 7 similar profiles in KAG.

Project Status

Ready for Analysis

PM: Brandon Hindbo · Project: PRU26300

Data Sources

HPD Calculation Engine

MCE Cost Model

RFQ / Caps Library

Knowledge Archive (KAG)

Compute Node

Mac Studio Online

Local deployment · Zero external token cost

3.5 hrs

Saved per design

94%

Historical match confidence

12,847

Comparable projects in archive

$156

Est. savings per design

Recommendation #1

Highest confidence · Historical match found

94% match

        HS 2.875" OD x 0.203" WT, Lead 7ft with 8"-10"-12" helix @ 0.500" THK, 2 extensions x 5ft, Total embedment 17ft, Est. torque 4,200 ft-lbs, FG GALVANIZED
      

Compression Capacity: 256 kips ultimate / 128 kips allowable

Design Load: 60 kips

Factor of Safety: 2.13 - PASS (required: 2.0)

Est. Installation Torque: 4,200 ft-lbs (max rated: 5,500 ft-lbs) - PASS

Structural Approved

Recommendation #2

Lower cost · Higher installability

87% match

        HS 2.375" OD x 0.179" WT, Lead 5ft with 8"-10" helix @ 0.500" THK, 3 extensions x 5ft, Total embedment 20ft, Est. torque 3,800 ft-lbs, FG GALVANIZED
      

Compression Capacity: 240 kips ultimate / 120 kips allowable

Design Load: 60 kips

Factor of Safety: 2.00 - PASS (required: 2.0)

Est. Installation Torque: 3,800 ft-lbs (max rated: 5,500 ft-lbs) - PASS

Geotech Approved

Recommendation #3

Conservative · Higher safety margin

82% match

        SS 1.75" OD x 0.500" WT, Lead 5ft with 6"-8"-10" helix @ 0.375" THK, 3 extensions x 5ft, Total embedment 20ft, Est. torque 3,200 ft-lbs, HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED
      

Compression Capacity: 280 kips ultimate / 140 kips allowable

Design Load: 60 kips

Factor of Safety: 2.33 - PASS (required: 2.0)

Est. Installation Torque: 3,200 ft-lbs (max rated: 4,800 ft-lbs) - PASS

Durability Approved

Recommendation #1 selected

HS 2.875" OD x 0.203" WT · 17ft embedment · FG Galvanized · FOS 2.13 · Est. $25,162

Code & Spacing Checks

Check	Standard	Result
Minimum spacing	3D center-to-center	Pass
Corrosion protection	50-year design life	Pass
Lateral capacity	CSA S6	Review
Zone C spacing	CSA S6	Flag

FOS Heat Map

Pile length (ft) x Pile diameter · Green = optimal cost/performance

* Optimal Zone: 2.875" diameter / 14-17ft · Best cost/performance balance · Design load: 60 kips

Under-designed Marginal Optimal Zone Overdesigned

8 sec

Average response time

97%

Citation coverage

30 min

Avg. engineer wait time saved

$39

Est. savings per query

Engineering Assistant

What pile section should I use for 17-kip compression in loose sand?

10:42 AM

For 17-kip compression in loose sand, a 2.875" shaft with 10/12" helix configuration at 14ft embedment provides FOS 2.1. Basis: 4 similar Alberta projects (PRU24892 Medicine Hat, PRU24038 Red Deer) and Cyntech Design Memo DM-2024-08, Section 4.2. Citation: CSA S6-19, 8.7.3.

10:42 AM

Suggested Prompts

94 hrs

Recovered this month to date

$7,332

Value of time recovered

2.0 hrs

Avg. time saved per design

12,847

Historical projects indexed

Recent Projects

Similar Alberta conditions matched to current project

ID	Project Name	Location	Date	Status	Confidence	Time Saved
PRU26300	Calgary NE Industrial Park	Calgary, AB	2024-09-12	Approved	94%	4.2 hrs
PRU24038	Red Deer Distribution Centre	Red Deer, AB	2024-08-29	Approved	91%	3.8 hrs
PRU24511	Lethbridge Commercial Plaza	Lethbridge, AB	2024-08-14	Review	87%	2.1 hrs
PRU24892	Medicine Hat Substation Upgrade	Medicine Hat, AB	2024-07-30	Approved	93%	4.5 hrs

93.4%

Overall Accuracy

+2.1% vs last quarter

91%

Recommendation Match

vs senior engineer

89%

Avg Confidence

Above threshold

2.7%

False Positive Rate

Target <5%

Designs completed this month

94 hrs

Hours recovered this month to date

$7,332 value of time recovered @ $78/hr burden

Accuracy by Step

Soil parameter extraction96%

Pile quantity / spacing91%

Code check validation88%

BOM & cost estimation85%

Node Health

Mac Studio Online · Last check: 14s ago

Healthy

Component	Status
HPD Calculation Engine	Healthy
Knowledge Archive (KAG)	Healthy
Citation Layer	Healthy
Document Parser	Degraded
Audit Logger	Healthy

Active Jobs

Real-time pipeline queue

09:14Analysis PRU26300 completed - 91% confidence

09:08Document PRU26300-geotech.pdf parsed

08:44User bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com logged in

08:43HPD Calculation Engine v2.17.05 indexed

08:12Recommendation engine batch job finished

Complete Audit Trail

Every decision traced · Immutable log

Time	User	Action	Object	Result
09:38:04	bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com	Engineer approval - Soil profile reduction	PRU26300 - APPROVED	Approved
09:12:04	bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com	Run analysis	PRU26300	Success
09:08:22	system	Index update	HPD v2.17.05	Success
08:44:11	bhindbo@cyntechgroup.com	Upload RFQ	PRU26300-geotech.pdf	Success
08:43:55	system	Compliance scan	All projects	Passed
08:12:00	system	Backup	Knowledge base	Success

Auto-Approval Thresholds

Recommendations published without review 90%

90%

Engineer review required (flag) 80%

80%

Critical manual override 65%

65%

Below 65% - BLOCKED. Cannot proceed. Senior engineer written sign-off required.

Sign-off must be recorded in the audit trail and attached to the project record before any design run can continue.

Review Gate Rules

⬡All >90% recommendations auto-logged
⬡80-90% flagged for senior review
⬡<80% blocked from client delivery
⬡Manual overrides recorded in audit trail
⬡Confidence tied to document version

Selected Project

PRU26300 - Willis Pool - Cal Tex Excavation

Configuration accepted

      Recommendation #1: HS 2.875" OD x 0.203" WT, Lead 7ft with 8"-10"-12" helix @ 0.500" THK, 2 extensions x 5ft, Total embedment 17ft, Est. torque 4,200 ft-lbs, FG GALVANIZED
    

Auto-Populated Proposal Sections

Section	Status	Detail
Cover letter	Ready	Cal Tex Excavation - Willis, TX - PRU26300
Technical Considerations	Ready	FOS 2.13 - Est. torque 4,200 ft-lbs - 17ft embedment
Soil Parameters table	Ready	Strata A/B/C/D - Su, phi, gamma values included
Installation Torque values	Ready	Est. 4,200 ft-lbs vs max rated 5,500 ft-lbs - PASS
Commercial Terms table	Ready	MCE pricing from 5,474-SKU database
General Terms and Conditions	Ready	Standard Cyntech GTC v4.2
PM sign-off	Pending	J. Nazareth P.Eng. - awaiting review

Disclaimer: Soil parameters based on historical data from comparable locations in the Knowledge Archive (KAG). Estimate accuracy +/-30%. On-site geotechnical investigation strongly recommended before permit submission. This output is not a sealed engineering document and cannot be used for construction sign-off.

Fast-Track Intake - target under 5 minutes

Project Location (city or coordinates)

Approximate Structure Type

Estimated Load Range (kips)

Nearest Historical Projects from KAG

ID	Location	Soil	Load	Config
PRU24103	SE Calgary	CH Clay	47 kips	HS 2.875" 17ft
PRU23412	Beltline	CH Clay	52 kips	HS 2.875" 18ft
PRU22891	NE Calgary	Mixed	61 kips	HS 3.5" 20ft

Rough estimate result:
Suggested: HS 2.875" OD x 0.203" WT, 17ft embedment, FG GALVANIZED
Indicative cost range: $18,500 - $26,400 CAD (12 piles)
Based on 23 comparable projects in Knowledge Archive.

🔒

RFQ / Procurement Automation

Phase 2 - Coming Soon

Phase 2 will automate the full procurement cycle. RFQ scope paragraphs auto-generate from HPD output and route to the procurement coordinator in Ignite CRM. Vendor price monitoring and MCE auto-population will eliminate the manual BOM process.

RFQ auto-population

Scope paragraph auto-generated from HPD Calculation Engine output. Routes to procurement coordinator in Ignite CRM.

Vendor price monitoring

Live pricing against MCE 5,474-SKU database. Flags cost variance from quote.

MCE auto-population

Material Cost Estimate v2.20.00 pre-filled from accepted pile configuration. Zero manual re-entry.

Engineer Portal

Field engineers, project managers, design staff

5 tabs

New Project

Upload geotech reports, review extracted soil parameters, enter design loads, accept and trigger HPD analysis.

Recommendations

Review AI-ranked pile configurations, FOS heat map, code compliance checks. Accept to generate proposal.

Ask AI

Engineering assistant trained on Cyntech design history, codes, and RFQ templates. Available inline on every tab.

Fast-Track

Budgetary estimates without a geotech report. Draft proposals in under 5 minutes from historical KAG data.

Export

Download sealed proposal PDF, push to Ignite CRM, or send to PM for sign-off. All sections auto-populated.

Typical workflow

New Project → Recommendations → Export

Average time: 8-12 minutes from upload to signed proposal PDF

Admin Portal

Management, QA, procurement coordinators. Full access: all engineer tabs plus admin-only tabs.

All tabs

Project History

12,847 indexed projects with full audit trail, provenance, confidence scores. Use any project as a reference for new designs.

AI Performance

Recommendation accuracy, false positive rate, confidence distribution. QA reviews before model retraining.

Monitoring

Live system health, job queue depth, compute node status, API uptime. Infrastructure visibility without IT access.

Audit Logs

Complete immutable record of every design decision, parameter change, and approval. Required for PE-signed documents.

Confidence

Per-project confidence breakdown by data source: soil match, load match, historical coverage. Flag outliers for manual review.

Procurement

Phase 2: RFQ auto-generation, vendor price monitoring against MCE 5,474-SKU database, Ignite CRM routing.

Admin use cases

Weekly QA review of recommendation accuracy

Audit pull for PE sign-off or dispute resolution

Phase 2: procurement coordinator workflow

Proposal Date:	5/18/2026
To:	Cal Tex Excavation
Attention:	Gilberto Pena
E-mail:	gpcaltex@gmail.com

New Project

Drop geotechnical PDF here

Drop structural drawings here

Design Recommendations

Ask AI

Project History

AI Performance

System Monitoring

Audit Logs

Confidence Configuration

Proposal Export

Budgetary Fast-Track

Procurement

Role Access